International

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020

65 controls. 41 other frameworks in our corpus share controls with it. Here is all of it, and how much of it you are already doing.

Page built . This page is derived from the framework corpus, which changes when the corpus is extended rather than daily.

65 controls 41 frameworks share controls with it International verified against its source document

Every control below is one this framework asks for. The right hand column counts how many other frameworks in our corpus carry the same control, which is the difference between doing this work once and doing it again for the next standard.

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 Trustworthy AI Evidence & Implementation Kit

65 controls is the documentation set somebody has to write. This is that set, already written: an adopt-ready artifact for every control in policy and procedure text you edit rather than draft, and the evidence checklist an auditor asks for against each.

See what is in it, $249

The same set every buyer of this kit receives. Nothing here is produced on request.

What you already have

Frameworks whose controls overlap this one, most first. If you run any of them, the count is roughly what you have already evidenced.

Every control

CodeControlAlso in
10Conclusions0
5.2Recognition of layers of trust1
5.3Application of software and data quality standards0
5.4Application of risk management4
5.5Hardware-assisted approaches0
6.1General concepts26
6.2Types of stakeholders0
6.3Assets0
6.4Values0
7.1Responsibility, accountability and governance0
7.2Safety0
8.1General: vulnerabilities, threats and challenges3
8.10System hardware faults1
8.2AI specific security threats0
8.2.1AI specific security threats: general0
8.2.2Data poisoning2
8.2.3Adversarial attacks0
8.2.4Model stealing0
8.2.5Hardware-focused threats to confidentiality and integrity0
8.3AI specific privacy threats0
8.3.1AI specific privacy threats: general3
8.3.2Data acquisition3
8.3.3Data pre-processing and modelling1
8.3.4Model query0
8.4Bias1
8.5Unpredictability1
8.6Opaqueness0
8.7Challenges related to the specification of AI systems0
8.8Challenges related to the implementation of AI systems0
8.8.1Data acquisition and preparation1
8.8.2Modelling0
8.8.3Model updates0
8.8.4Software defects0
8.9Challenges related to the use of AI systems0
8.9.1Human-computer interaction (HCI) factors0
8.9.2Misapplication of AI systems that demonstrate realistic human behaviour0
9.1General: mitigation measures3
9.10Testing and evaluation1
9.10.1Testing and evaluation: general3
9.10.2Software validation and verification methods0
9.10.3Robustness considerations0
9.10.4Privacy-related considerations0
9.10.5System predictability considerations0
9.11Use and applicability0
9.11.1Compliance5
9.11.2Managing expectations0
9.11.3Product labelling0
9.11.4Cognitive science research0
9.2Transparency10
9.3Explainability1
9.3.1Explainability: general3
9.3.2Aims of explanation1
9.3.3Ex-ante vs ex-post explanation0
9.3.4Approaches to explainability0
9.3.5Modes of ex-post explanation1
9.3.6Levels of explainability0
9.3.7Evaluation of the explanations2
9.4Controllability1
9.4.1Controllability: general3
9.4.2Human-in-the-loop control points0
9.5Strategies for reducing bias0
9.6Privacy4
9.7Reliability, resilience and robustness1
9.8Mitigating system hardware faults0
9.9Functional safety1

Tell me when ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 files something new

One email when a public company newly discloses something this framework governs, naming the company and what our corpus says it puts in scope. Nothing else, and one click to stop.

What this page is

A control-level reference for ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020, drawn from our framework corpus. Control codes and titles are references to the standard, not reproductions of it. The overlap counts and the auditor artefacts are our own work and are the part you will not find elsewhere.

Measure this against what you already run · All frameworks · Today's edition