99filers, current period
66the period before
50controls it touches
17frameworks
Operational Resilience in 10-K and 10-Q filings, by month.
The marked line is the first month any public company in our record used the phrase; everything left of it is nobody writing it down.
Companies disclosing it
99
wrote this into a filing with the SEC
What it obligates
50
controls across 17 frameworks whose text speaks to it
Employers hiring for it
4,368
open US roles name it, and the ones below are hiring now
The long view, in annual and quarterly filings
A 10-K or 10-Q is a periodic report, so this counts how often the phrase appears in routine annual and quarterly reporting. It moves far more slowly and the numbers are larger.
Every month since 2008. The last point is the current month and is still
filling, so it always looks lower than it will be.
2008
peak 145 in February 2026
2026
Share this finding
Half as many again as the same quarter last year. The card below carries the whole finding, so it makes
sense to somebody who never clicks through.
Who disclosed it
From SEC full-text search over 8-K filings. Every row links to the filing itself.
| Company | Form | Filed | |
|---|
| PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC PFS | 8-K | 2026-08-04 | filing |
| ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. EPRT | 8-K | 2026-09-16 | filing |
| Nuburu, Inc. | 8-K | 2026-07-21 | filing |
| Mobility Global Inc. | 8-K | 2026-07-02 | filing |
| Alcoa Corp AA | 8-K | 2026-09-09 | filing |
| AZZ INC AZZ | 8-K | 2026-07-08 | filing |
| Aurora Innovation, Inc. | 8-K | 2026-07-29 | filing |
| UNIVERSAL CORP /VA/ UVV | 8-K | 2026-08-05 | filing |
| Medline Inc. MDLN | 8-K | 2026-08-05 | filing |
| Mount Logan Capital Inc. | 8-K | 2026-08-11 | filing |
| Replimune Group, Inc. REPL | 10-Q | 2026-08-14 | filing |
| Civeo Corp CVEO | 8-K | 2026-07-30 | filing |
| MARA Holdings, Inc. MARA | 8-K | 2026-08-06 | filing |
| TREDEGAR CORP TG | 8-K | 2026-08-07 | filing |
The full search on EDGAR
Who is hiring for it
A sample of the open roles naming this phrase. An employer paying a salary
against something is the least ambiguous demand signal there is, and every row links to the
posting so the claim can be checked rather than believed. The total above is the whole US
market; these are the ones we hold the posting for.
| Role | Posted |
|---|
| Manager, Change and Configuration Management AST SpaceMobile, Inc. · Lanham, Maryland, United States | 2026-09-21 |
| Director, Resilience COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC · United States | 2026-09-17 |
| Senior Engineer, Directory Services GoDaddy Inc. · United States | 2026-09-17 |
| Senior Solutions Engineer, Okta Okta, Inc. · Chicago, Illinois | 2026-09-17 |
| Professional Services Consultant Zscaler, Inc. · Bangalore, IND; Bangalore, IND | 2026-09-16 |
| Lead IAM Engineer Braze, Inc. · Austin | 2026-09-15 |
| Lead IAM Engineer Braze, Inc. · Toronto | 2026-09-15 |
| Lead IAM Engineer Braze, Inc. · Chicago | 2026-09-15 |
| Solutions Architect (Germany or Austria) COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC · Frankfurt, Germany | 2026-09-15 |
| Infrastructure Engineer Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc. · London or remote within the UK | 2026-09-15 |
| Senior Compliance Risk Manager - Securities Compliance MERCURY SYSTEMS INC · San Francisco, CA, New York, NY, Portland, OR, or Remote within United States | 2026-09-15 |
| Senior Solutions Engineer, Okta (Strategic Accounts - Minnesota) Okta, Inc. · Minnesota | 2026-09-15 |
| Brokerage Risk Analyst Intern (Summer 2027) Robinhood Markets, Inc. · Chicago, IL | 2026-09-14 |
| Principal Engineer, Duo Agent Platform Gitlab Inc. · Remote, Canada; Remote, Poland; Remote, United Kingdom; Remote, United States | 2026-09-11 |
Which industries file it
Companies grouped by the industry classification on their own filing. A count, not a
survey.
| Industry | | Companies |
|---|
| Banking | | 77 |
| Software and IT services | | 69 |
| Securities and investment | | 38 |
| Insurance | | 26 |
| Services and entertainment | | 24 |
| Chemicals and pharmaceuticals | | 23 |
| Mining and extraction | | 16 |
| Industrial machinery | | 13 |
| Holding and investment offices | | 12 |
| Business services | | 9 |
What it obligates
Our corpus holds 50 controls across
17 frameworks whose text speaks to this. Not a judgement:
these controls say so, and each is one lookup from its source document. Ordered by how much each
framework has to say about it, so the one that will cost you the most work is first. Every name
opens that framework in the corpus.
What an auditor will ask you to produce
The artefacts named on those controls, most frequently cited first.
- BCP plan
- DR test results
- vendor dependency map
- critical service list
- Pipeline + emerging risk readiness
- Multi-framework alignment + crosswalk
- The approved continuity and resilience policy with approver and date
- Annual review record
How it usually fails
Recorded when each control was verified against its source. This is where programmes
that think they are covered turn out not to be.
- untested DR
- single vendor dependency
- no exit plan
- missing comms tree
- Multi-framework alignment ad-hoc
- International alignment weak
ISO 22301 Evidence & Implementation Kit
49 controls sit behind ISO 22301:2019, and this is the documentation set for them: an adopt-ready artifact per control, and the evidence an auditor asks for against each.
See what is in it, $249
The same set every buyer of this kit receives. Nothing here is produced on request.
49If you already run ISO 22301:2019, that is the 49 controls behind this disclosure, already evidenced.
229And ISO 27002:2022 is not a separate programme. 229 of its controls are the same controls. If it is on next year's plan, that part of it is already done.
224And ISO 27001:2022 is not a separate programme. 224 of its controls are the same controls. If it is on next year's plan, that part of it is already done.
50And NIS2 Directive is not a separate programme. 50 of its controls are the same controls. If it is on next year's plan, that part of it is already done.
Run as two programmes
278 controls
ISO 22301:2019 and ISO 27002:2022 scoped separately, each with its own
evidence, its own owner and its own budget line. This is how almost everybody does it.
Run once, counted twice
229 already done
229 of ISO 27002:2022's controls are controls you evidenced for
ISO 22301:2019. Same artefacts, same owner, no second effort. The mapping is the
only reason anybody knows.
Operational Resilience in 10-K and 10-Q filings, by month.
The marked line is the first month any public company in our record used the phrase; everything left of it is nobody writing it down.
What this actually means
- Why now
- 99 public companies wrote this into an 8-K in the last seven days, 50% more than the seven before. That is not sentiment or a survey. It is a count of companies choosing to put a phrase into a document they are legally accountable for.
- Who already cares
- 4,368 open US roles name this work today, which suggests increased attention to it beyond what any filing says. A job advertisement clears a budget holder and a filing clears legal, so the two answer to different people. We have not measured which moves first, only that both are moving.
- What comes into scope
- Once the phrase is on the record it maps to obligations within ISO 22301:2019, DORA, EU Cyber Resilience Act. 83 controls behind those, and the difference between asserting them and evidencing them is the whole of the work.
- Who is quietly ahead
- Anyone already running ISO 22301:2019 has done 229 of the controls that carry ISO 27002:2022 too. Same evidence, second standard. Most organisations run those as two programmes with two budgets because nobody told them the mapping existed.
- Who is exposed
- 16 companies disclosed this for the first time in the last ninety days, out of 380 in total. A first mention is a company deciding it can no longer not say it. Whoever has not yet is either genuinely unaffected or has not looked, and nothing here distinguishes the two.
What this obligates
The instruments in our corpus that govern this disclosure, and how many controls sit
behind each. This is not a filing count. It is what applies once a company has written the
phrase down.
4 frameworks, 83 controls between them.
ISO 22301:2019 holds 49 controls. They appear again inside
122 other frameworks in our corpus; the 10 strongest are shown. Thickness and
size both carry the number of controls shared, so work done once counts in every framework on
this diagram.
What closing it also moves
The same controls appear in other frameworks through mappings held in our corpus. Work
done here is already progress there. This is the part that is not in EDGAR and not in any public
dataset: it comes from mappings built and verified by hand, control by control.
ISO 27002:2022229
ISO 27001:2022224
NIS2 Directive50
ISO/IEC 42001:202345
ISO 9001:201539
ISO 27701:201935
ISO 22000:201832
ISO 37001:201628
Counted as controls reached through cross-framework mappings. It measures
overlap of work, not compliance with the named framework.
Run as two programmes
278 controls
ISO 22301:2019 and ISO 27002:2022 scoped separately, each with its own
evidence, its own owner and its own budget line. This is how almost everybody does it.
Run once, counted twice
229 already done
229 of ISO 27002:2022's controls are controls you evidenced for
ISO 22301:2019. Same artefacts, same owner, no second effort. The mapping is the
only reason anybody knows.
49If you already run ISO 22301:2019, that is the 49 controls behind this disclosure, already evidenced.
229And ISO 27002:2022 is not a separate programme. 229 of its controls are the same controls. If it is on next year's plan, that part of it is already done.
224And ISO 27001:2022 is not a separate programme. 224 of its controls are the same controls. If it is on next year's plan, that part of it is already done.
50And NIS2 Directive is not a separate programme. 50 of its controls are the same controls. If it is on next year's plan, that part of it is already done.
Tell me when Operational Resilience files something new
One email when a public company newly discloses this, naming the company and what our corpus says it puts in scope. Nothing else, and one click to stop.
Where this comes from
The left half is public record: SEC full-text search over 8-K filings, counted across a
14 day window against the equivalent window before it. You can check
every row.
The right half is ours: 723 frameworks and
20,473 controls, 531 of those frameworks verified against
their source documents, with the auditor evidence and common failure modes recorded control by
control. Controls appear here because their own text names this term.
Cite this
The Art of Service Signals. Operational Resilience corporate disclosure activity: 99 filers against 66 in the prior period, in 10-K and 10-Q filings, this quarter against the same quarter last year. Accessed 23 September 2026. https://signals.theartofservice.com/t/operational-resilience/
Free to use with attribution, no permission needed. The chart downloads as an SVG
with the source printed on it. If you cite it we would like to know, but you do not need to
ask.
Today's edition ·
How programmes fail ·
The obligation index