Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements: every control, and what you already have

8 controls 199 frameworks share controls with it United States — Nevada verified against its source document

Every control below is one this framework asks for. The right hand column counts how many other frameworks in our corpus carry the same control, which is the difference between doing this work once and doing it again for the next standard.

There is no implementation kit for this framework yet. The control list and the overlap above are free and complete.

What you already have

Frameworks whose controls overlap this one, most first. If you run any of them, the count is roughly what you have already evidenced.

If you run	Shared controls
Bahrain PDPL	5	measure it →
Barbados Data Protection Act 2019	5	measure it →
Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)	5	measure it →
ISO/IEC 29134:2023	5	measure it →
Nebraska Data Privacy Act	5	measure it →
Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (NDPA)	5	measure it →
Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)	5	measure it →
South Korea PIPA	5	measure it →
Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023)	5	measure it →
UK Defence Standard 05-138	5	measure it →
Annex 11 to EU GMP	4	measure it →
API 1164	4	measure it →

Every control

Code	Control	Also in
`NGCB-1`	Regulation 5.260 Scope, Applicability, and Licensee Categories	67
`NGCB-2`	Cybersecurity Best Practices Framework Adoption	0
`NGCB-3`	Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Ongoing Risk Monitoring	0
`NGCB-4`	Designated Cybersecurity Officer and Personnel Training	0
`NGCB-5`	Technical Security Controls - Access + Network + Encryption + Vulnerability + Logging	61
`NGCB-6`	Incident Response, 72-Hour NGCB Notification, and Independent Investigation	150
`NGCB-7`	Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management	57
`NGCB-8`	Annual Independent Cybersecurity Assessment + Reporting + Board Oversight	61

Tell me when Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements files something new

One email when a public company newly discloses something this framework governs, naming the company and what our corpus says it puts in scope. Nothing else, and one click to stop.

What an auditor will ask you to produce

The artefacts named on the failure modes this framework speaks to.

System security plans
Standard operating procedures
Current-as-at dates and approval records
Revenue analysis
Exemption documentation
Annual applicability review
TPSP register
AOC collection log
contractual responsibility matrix
monitoring cadence

How programmes fail on this

Failure modes named by this framework and others. Each opens the full record.

no annual review named by 13 frameworks
no ongoing monitoring named by 9 frameworks
No phishing simulation named by 5 frameworks
no board reporting named by 5 frameworks
No independent assessment named by 4 frameworks
No data inventory named by 4 frameworks

What this page is

A control-level reference for Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements, drawn from our framework corpus. Control codes and titles are references to the standard, not reproductions of it. The overlap counts and the auditor artefacts are our own work and are the part you will not find elsewhere.

Measure this against what you already run · All frameworks · Today's edition