Named by 4 frameworks

Corrective actions closed without verifying effectiveness

4 of the 723 frameworks in our corpus warn about this same failure, across 6 separate controls. That convergence is the measurement: it is not one standard's opinion.

Data measured , page built 22 September 2026 at 16:18 UTC.

4 standards bodies wrote this down separately. None of them consulted the others. That is not a preference you can argue with, it is what happens.From 6 controls across our corpus

ISO 56002:2019 Innovation Management Evidence & Implementation Kit

This is the complete documentation set: an adopt-ready artifact for every control in policy and procedure text you edit rather than draft, and the evidence checklist an auditor asks for against each.

See what is in it, $249

The same set every buyer of this kit receives. Nothing here is produced on request.

Who warns about it

Every framework below independently names this failure. They were written by different bodies, in different jurisdictions, for different industries, and they agree.

What an auditor asks for

The artefacts named on the controls that warn about this failure. This is what closes it, and what you will be asked to produce when somebody checks.

What closing it also buys you

The 6 controls that warn about this failure map onto controls in other frameworks. Close them here and this much of each of those is closed too. It is the same work counted once, which is usually the difference between a programme that finishes and one that does not.

ISO 45001:20183
ISO/IEC 42001:20232
ISO 22301:20193
ISO 22000:20182
ISO 55001:20146
ISO 37301:20213
ISO 37001:20164
ISO 50001:20183
ISO 27701:20191
ISO 14001:20154
ISO 9001:20152
ISO 14004:20163

Scaled against the framework this reaches furthest into, not against a hundred percent. Exact figures below.

Also progressesCovered Controls reached
ISO 45001:2018
International
3.6%2 of 55
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International
2.4%2 of 83
ISO 22301:2019
International
3.5%2 of 57
ISO 22000:2018
International
2.9%2 of 70
ISO 55001:2014
International
6.9%2 of 29
ISO 37301:2021
International
3.9%2 of 51
ISO 37001:2016
International
4.7%2 of 43
ISO 50001:2018
International
3.0%2 of 66
ISO 27701:2019
International
1.4%2 of 145
ISO 14001:2015
International
4.3%2 of 47
ISO 9001:2015
International
2.8%2 of 71
ISO 14004:2016
International
3.7%2 of 54

Read as: closing this failure reaches that share of the named framework's control library through cross-framework mappings held in our corpus. It is not a claim of compliance with that framework, it is a measure of how much of it you have already touched.

Where this comes from

Harvested from the control library itself. Every control in our corpus carries the evidence an auditor expects and the ways implementations commonly fail, recorded when that control was verified against its source document. This page is those two fields, for one failure, across every framework that names it.

The overlap is computed by traversing 332,959 cross-framework control mappings out from the specific controls that warn about this failure, not from the frameworks they sit in. Those mappings were built control by control against source documents.

Nothing here is inferred, predicted or scored. The number at the top is a count of frameworks.

Where this goes next

  1. The other failures the whole industry independently agrees on:The full catalogue →
  2. Everything else ISO 22313:2020 asks for, and what it overlaps with:ISO 22313:2020 in full →
  3. Which companies are disclosing the events this failure produces:Who disclosed it →
  4. What changed in those disclosures this week:What changed →
  5. And today's story, which is usually one of these arriving in public:Today's edition →

All failure modes ยท The index