Secure by Design: A Guide for Manufacturers (CISA): every control, and what you already have

26 controls 107 frameworks share controls with it United States (Federal) verified against its source document

Every control below is one this framework asks for. The right hand column counts how many other frameworks in our corpus carry the same control, which is the difference between doing this work once and doing it again for the next standard.

There is no implementation kit for this framework yet. The control list and the overlap above are free and complete.

What you already have

Frameworks whose controls overlap this one, most first. If you run any of them, the count is roughly what you have already evidenced.

If you run	Shared controls
BSI IT-Grundschutz	6	measure it →
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)	6	measure it →
FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)	6	measure it →
ISO/IEC 27011:2024	6	measure it →
Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)	6	measure it →
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0	5	measure it →
ISO 27017	5	measure it →
ISO 27018	5	measure it →
ISO/IEC 27043:2015	5	measure it →
ISO/SAE 21434	5	measure it →
NIST SP 800-190	5	measure it →
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5	5	measure it →

Every control

Code	Control	Also in
`CISABD-1`	Take Ownership of Customer Security Outcomes	78
`CISABD-2`	Embrace Radical Transparency and Accountability	21
`CISABD-3`	Build Organizational Structure and Leadership for Secure Outcomes	32
`SBD-10`	CVE Issuance with Complete Detail	0
`SBD-11`	Evidence of Intrusion in Logs	0
`SBD-12`	Secure Software Development Lifecycle	0
`SBD-13`	SBOM and Software Provenance	0
`SBD-14`	Open Source Software Stewardship	0
`SBD-15`	Customer Security Outcome Metrics	0
`SBD-16`	Eliminate Hardcoded Secrets	0
`SBD-17`	Authentication for Local and Network Interfaces	0
`SBD-18`	Loss-Free Recovery and Backups	0
`SBD-19`	Reduce Hardening Guide Length	0
`SBD-20`	Sign the Secure by Design Pledge	0
`SBD-5`	Mandate MFA, Especially for Privileged Users	0
`SBD-6`	Reduce Entire Classes of Vulnerabilities	0
`SBD-7`	Increase Use of Secure Defaults	0
`SBD-8`	Patch Adoption	0
`SBD-9`	Establish a Vulnerability Disclosure Policy	0
`SBD-DEV-01`	Memory-Safe Programming Languages	0
`SBD-DEV-02`	Parameterized Queries	0
`SBD-DEV-03`	Web Template Frameworks with Auto-Escaping	0
`SBD-DEV-04`	Phishing-Resistant Authentication	58
`SBD-DEV-05`	Secure Software Development Framework	18
`SBD-DEV-06`	Threat Modeling	6
`SBD-DEV-07`	Dependency Management and SBOM	27

Tell me when Secure by Design: A Guide for Manufacturers (CISA) files something new

One email when a public company newly discloses something this framework governs, naming the company and what our corpus says it puts in scope. Nothing else, and one click to stop.

What an auditor will ask you to produce

The artefacts named on the failure modes this framework speaks to.

Memory safe language adoption plan
SAST evidence
Threat model artifacts
Threat models / architecture-analysis records (STRIDE or equivalent)
Identified threats and mitigations
Threat model

How programmes fail on this

Failure modes named by this framework and others. Each opens the full record.

No threat modelling named by 3 frameworks

What this page is

A control-level reference for Secure by Design: A Guide for Manufacturers (CISA), drawn from our framework corpus. Control codes and titles are references to the standard, not reproductions of it. The overlap counts and the auditor artefacts are our own work and are the part you will not find elsewhere.

Measure this against what you already run · All frameworks · Today's edition