26 controls
35 frameworks share controls with it
European Union
verified against its source document
Every control below is one this framework asks for. The right hand column counts how
many other frameworks in our corpus carry the same control, which is the difference between
doing this work once and doing it again for the next standard.
DORA Evidence & Implementation Kit
26 controls is the documentation set somebody has to write. This is that set,
already written: an adopt-ready artifact for every control in policy and procedure text you
edit rather than draft, and the evidence checklist an auditor asks for against each.
See what is in it, $249
The same set every buyer of this kit receives. Nothing here is produced on request.
What you already have
Frameworks whose controls overlap this one, most first. If you run any of them, the
count is roughly what you have already evidenced.
Every control
| Code | Control | Also in |
|---|
DORA-Art.10 | Detection | 18 |
DORA-Art.11 | Response and recovery | 19 |
DORA-Art.12 | Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery | 19 |
DORA-Art.13 | Learning and evolving | 19 |
DORA-Art.14 | Communication | 20 |
DORA-Art.16 | Simplified ICT risk management framework | 13 |
DORA-Art.17 | ICT-related incident management process | 22 |
DORA-Art.18 | Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threats | 16 |
DORA-Art.19 | Reporting of major ICT-related incidents | 20 |
DORA-Art.23 | Operational or security payment-related incidents | 13 |
DORA-Art.24 | General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing | 20 |
DORA-Art.25 | Testing of ICT tools and systems | 18 |
DORA-Art.26 | Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT | 10 |
DORA-Art.27 | Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPT | 10 |
DORA-Art.28 | ICT third-party risk: general principles | 26 |
DORA-Art.29 | Preliminary assessment of ICT concentration risk at entity level | 16 |
DORA-Art.30 | Key contractual provisions | 24 |
DORA-Art.31 | Designation of critical ICT third-party service providers | 13 |
DORA-Art.45 | Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence | 15 |
DORA-Art.5 | Governance and organisation | 20 |
DORA-Art.50 | Administrative penalties and remedial measures | 16 |
DORA-Art.56 | Data protection | 16 |
DORA-Art.6 | ICT risk management framework | 22 |
DORA-Art.7 | ICT systems, protocols and tools | 16 |
DORA-Art.8 | Identification | 23 |
DORA-Art.9 | Protection and prevention | 21 |
Tell me when DORA files something new
One email when a public company newly discloses something this framework governs, naming the company and what our corpus says it puts in scope. Nothing else, and one click to stop.
What an auditor will ask you to produce
The artefacts named on the failure modes this framework speaks to.
- Crisis communication plan for major ICT incidents
- Crisis communication plan and stakeholder contact lists
- Records of recovery communications to internal/external parties
- Public-relations and reputation-management procedures
- Crisis communication plan and stakeholder/contact lists
- Records of notifications during incidents
How programmes fail on this
Failure modes named by this framework and others. Each opens the full record.
What this page is
A control-level reference for DORA, drawn from our framework corpus. Control codes and
titles are references to the standard, not reproductions of it. The overlap counts and the
auditor artefacts are our own work and are the part you will not find elsewhere.
Measure this against what you already run ·
All frameworks · Today's edition